Rajpal Yadav ₹9 Crore Cheque Bounce Case: Actor Pulled Up by Delhi High Court, Gets To Relief - UPDATE

Bollywood actor Rajpal Yadav faces continued pressure from the Delhi High Court in a Rs. 9 crore cheque bounce case, with Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma reserving judgment on Thursday and refusing extra time to clear dues, despite Rajpal Yadav expressing willingness in court to pay the remaining amount.

During the hearing, Justice Sharma strongly criticised conflicting stands taken on behalf of Rajpal Yadav. The court observed that statements made by Rajpal Yadav did not match arguments advanced by legal representatives, which led to visible irritation from the bench as the dispute over unpaid dues continued.

Rajpal Yadav cheque bounce case background and loan details

The Rajpal Yadav cheque bounce case began in 2010 after Rajpal Yadav borrowed Rs 5 crore from Delhi-based Murali Projects Pvt Ltd. The money was taken to fund Rajpal Yadav’s directorial project Ata Pata Laapata, released in 2012, which performed poorly at the box office and caused financial trouble.

The film’s commercial failure led to a disagreement over repayment between Rajpal Yadav and Murali Projects Pvt Ltd. Over time, interest and related amounts increased the liability to nearly Rs 9 crore. Rajpal Yadav later secured interim bail after depositing a portion of this outstanding sum with the court.

Courtroom exchange in Rajpal Yadav cheque bounce case

Justice Sharma addressed Rajpal Yadav directly, expressing displeasure at changing positions during proceedings. The judge stated, "Never think the judge is weak if the judge is nice to you." The remark underlined concern that the court’s leniency was being misunderstood while dues remained unsettled.

Rajpal Yadav’s counsel argued that further payment should not be required because Rajpal Yadav had already served a jail sentence. In contrast, Rajpal Yadav told the court that the dues would be settled. This contradiction triggered further questioning from Justice Sharma on the purpose of continuing the matter.

Questioning the inconsistency, the judge remarked, "You are saying you are willing to pay, but your lawyers are saying that since you have already gone to jail, you will not pay. If you are willing to pay, then why am I hearing the matter? Make the payment."

Financial strain and plea in Rajpal Yadav cheque bounce case

Rajpal Yadav said personal finances had collapsed, and several properties were sold. Rajpal Yadav told the court about selling five flats while dealing with the long-running dispute. Rajpal Yadav added, "I am not emotional, send me to jail 5 more times."

In an emotional request, Rajpal Yadav asked for 30 additional days to clear the remaining Rs. 6 crore. Justice Sharma declined any extension, saying, "No means no. I will reserve. I will not give more time." The Delhi High Court conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act, given by a magisterial court in 2018 and upheld in 2019, therefore continues to stand while the reserved judgment is awaited.

Year	Event in Rajpal Yadav cheque bounce case
2010	Rs 5 crore loan taken from Murali Projects Pvt Ltd.
2012	Ata Pata Laapata released; film failed commercially.
2018	Conviction under the Negotiable Instruments Act; six-month jail sentence.
2019	Conviction upheld; dues rose to nearly Rs 9 crore.